Use of Social Insurance Numbers in Civic Identity Hashing

Privacy-Respecting Justification & Compliance Summary
CanuckDUCK Research Corp. | April 2025

❖ Purpose

CanuckDUCK employs a one-way, local hashing system that accepts Social Insurance Numbers (SINs) solely as a means to establish the uniqueness of a civic identity record. This record is not linked to government services, financial records, or any real-world credential—only to an anonymized, cryptographic identity used in our civic engagement ecosystem.

❖ Legislative Compliance Summary

While the Employment Insurance Act restricts the issuance and usage of SINs to authorized government programs, it permits their use for data processing purposes (Auditor General Report, 1.7–1.8). Our system never stores or transmits SINs. Instead, it:

  • Accepts a SIN input once during the identity registration phase.
  • Validates the SIN externally via one of the following:
    • Third-party verification services (gov.ca, etc.)
    • Snail mail credential validation
    • Anonymous mailing challenge (proof of access to a mailing address)
  • Generates a unique, non-reversible hash, which becomes the civic identity anchor.
  • Discards the original SIN input immediately after hashing.

At no point is the SIN used as a credential, login mechanism, or tied to any account accessible by users or staff.

❖ Differentiation from Government Usage

Element

Government SIN Process

CanuckDUCK Process

Role of SIN

Credential for service entitlement

Proof of uniqueness only

Identity verification

Performed by HRDC (with weaknesses)

External or physical mail-based

Storage

Centralized and permanent

Not stored or transmitted

Reuse prevention

None; multiple SINs can exist

Enforced via 1-to-1 hash constraint

Fraud vulnerability

High (19M SINs issued with no proof pre-1976)

Low; validation required before token issuance

Legal claim

Entitlement to government services

No legal claim—civic participation only

❖ Core Principle: Trust Without Retention

The use of a SIN enables the creation of a single civic record per individual, but we never retain the identifier itself. The process is strictly about ensuring that:

  • No one person can create multiple identities, and
  • Every identity belongs to a real person (verified externally).

If CanuckDUCK performs identity validation directly (e.g., by snail mail), it does so only to confirm that the individual has access to the mailing address they submitted—not to validate the SIN itself.

❖ Privacy & Security Considerations

  • All civic tokens (Wisdom, Solidarity, Stature) are anonymized and detached from real-world identifiers.
  • Our system never displays, logs, or transmits SINs.
  • Civic identities generated from a SIN are not legally or financially binding.
  • Any use of third-party verification services is governed by strict isolation and audit logging policies.

❖ Conclusion

Our limited, controlled use of the SIN is fully aligned with its definition as a data-processing file number and is far more conservative than even historical government practices. It exists purely to uphold integrity, fairness, and one-person-one-voice participation in a civic context—and never for identification, entitlement, or surveillance.